Goodseo
Germanium nanowire maturation below the eutectic temperature.(REPORTS)Nanowires are conventionally assumed to grow via a vapor-Liquid-solid process, during which material from a vapor is built-into the expanding nanowire via the Liquid catalyst, commonly a low--melting point eutectic alloy. But still, nanowires have been witnessed to grow below the eutectic heat level, and the state of the catalyst remnants arguable Utilizing in situ microscopy, we displayed which, for the vintage Ge/Au system, nanowire maturation can happen below the eutectic heat level with either liquid or rigorous catalysts at the equivalent heat level. We found, unpredictably, which the catalyst state is up to the maturation pressure and thermal history. We propose which these phenomena may just be as a result of kinetic enrichment of the eutectic alloy composition and expect these results to be related for other nanowire systems.
quang cao website
..-5]Torr),weordinarilyseriouslylookintosustainedmaturationof<111>-oriented Ge cables at temperature ranges within the 250[degrees] to 400[degrees]C range. Under these conditions, most cables grow perpendicular about the substrate and are imaged with the electron beam perpendicular about the cable axis (21). Bright-field and dark-field imagining imply that the cables are epitaxial, single-crystal, and are encircled by silky sidewalls. Moreover, by the acquisition of video photos at 30 fires for each 2nd, maturation kinetics for individual cables may be assessed.
[Statistic 1 OMITTED]
Hysteresis with heat level is common for first-order phase transitions and is perhaps exacerbated at the nanoscale (22, 23). Thus, it isn't startling which hysteresis is really so absolutely observable in these researches. But still, close exploration of video photos namely those in Fig. 1 suggests that the cables keep growing even next the catalyst particle has hardened.
[Statistic 2 OMITTED]
. Not surprisingly,., we discover which the catalyst droplets harden., independent of every doubts in heat level calibration.
[Statistic 3 OMITTED] seo la gi
seo top 10
Nonetheless,, since pressure can influence surface powers (for instance, through transforms in hydrogen coverage).. Any alter in surface powers 're going to adjust the coerce balance at the 3 x phase queue and, for these reasons, the steady-state droplet shape and cable diameter (24).. Statistic 4 is actually a typical plot of droplet altitudes and base diameters for a unique cable, as the pressure is diversified recurrently amongst taller and cut back valuations. Though the transforms are petite,, the droplet height cuts down whilst the droplet diameter speeds up. Absolutely,, advising that there're visible transforms in surface energy with pressure.
[Statistic 4 OMITTED]
, we may expect which droplets on narrower cables will be more immune to solidification. In comparison, we seriously look into which smaller droplets harden sooner than larger ones, as in Fig. 3..
We propose in lieu which the liquid phase may just be efficaciously firmly against solidification by Ge supersaturation, that rises from a maturation process. Solidification demands some undercooling to vanquish the nucleation hindrance for a brand new phase. Here, crystalline Ge is already present. The crucial step for solidification is nucleation of a rigorous Au particle, and this step regulates the level of undercooling. Once Au nucleates, the liquid solidifies suddenly, with Ge impending out from solution and blending together inside the cable throughout a unmarried video flare, as mentioned before as regards to Fig. 1. Thus,.
quang cao tu khoa
[Statistic 5 OMITTED]
This appliances may possibly also clarify why narrower cables harden first., the supersaturation starts to diminish as overabundance Ge is built-into the cable, either at the maturation aspect or by diffusing about the sidewall (30). This Ge deficits comes up for a price which scales with cross-sectional region or circumference of the cable, despite the fact that the quantity of overabundance Ge scales with droplet loudness, therefore, the time scale for the decline of supersaturation speeds up with elevating cable diameter, describing the witnessed trend.
The most assuming point is even when the Ge supersaturation may be quantitatively big enough to account for the observations. We forcast which a 1% enhance in Ge emphasis could cut back the Au nucleation heat level by roughly 40 K, and a 4% enhance in Ge may normalize the liquid phase against Au nucleation at temperature ranges as low as 260[degrees]C. Such big kinetically driven supersaturations aren't predicted in typical macroscopic systems but become increasingly possible in boldly facetted systems since they constrict about the nanoscale (28, 31). The level of supersaturation would enhance with maturation ratio, that may clarify the victorious maturation of Ge nanowires at temperature ranges as low as 260[degrees]C in traditional chemical vapor deposition, where the maturation ratio is far taller than which in our researches.
In closing, we certainly have represented which through the maturation of Ge cables utilizing Au,,. Nanowire maturation persists whatever the state the catalyst is during. Simply speaking, both VLS and VSS procedures could perform beneath the equivalent conditions to grow Ge cables.. We suggest a likely appliances for the existence of a liquid catalyst at these temperature ranges,. These results illustrate which source gas pressure, although normally not thought out a key element, is truly requisite in deciding upon the maturation mode..
References and Notes
(1.) K. Haraguchi, T. Katsuyama, K. Hiruma, K. Ogawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 745 (1992).
(2.) J. Hu, T. W. Odom, C. M. Lieber, Acc. Chem. Res. 32, 435 (1999).
(3.) L. Samuelson, Mater. This era 6, 22 (2003).
(4.) H. J. Follower, P. Werner, M. Zacharias, Petite 2, 700 (2006).
(5.) R. S. Wagner, W. C. Ellis, Appl. Phys. Left. 4, 89 (1964).
(6.) Y. Wang, V. Schmidt, S. Senz, U. Gosele, Nat. Nanotechnol. 1, 186 (2006).
(7.) Y. Yao, 5. Follower, Mater. Left. 61, 177 seo top 10 (2007).
(8.) T. I. Kamins, R. S. Williams, D. P. Basile, T. Hesjedal, J. S. Harris, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 1008 (2001).
(9.) G. A. Bootsma, H. J. Gassen, J. Cryst. Maturation 10, 223 (1971).
(10.) Y. Miyamoto, M. Hirata, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 14, 1419 (1975).
(11.) D. Wang, H. Dai, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 4783 (2002).
(A dozen.) T. I. Kamins, X. Li, R. S. Williams, Nano Lett. 4, 503 (2004).
(13.) A. B. Greytak, L. J. Lauhon, M. S. Gudiksen, C. M. Lieber, Appl. Phys. Left. 84, 4176 (2004).
(14.) H. Adhikari, A. F. Marshall, C. E. D. Chidsey, P. C. McIntyre, Nano Left. 6, 318 (2006).
(15.) K. Hiruma et al., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 447 (1995).
(16.) A. I. Persson et al., Nat. Mater. 3, 677 (2004).
(17.) J. C. Harmand et al., Appl. Phys. Left. 87, 203101 (2005).
(18.) M. Tchernycheva, J. C Harmand, G. Patriarche, L. Travers, G. E. Cirlin, Nanotechnology 17, 4025 (2006).
cong ty seo (19.) K. A. Cock et al., Nano Lett. 5, 761 (2005).
(20.) H. D. Park,, S. M. Prokes, R. C. Cammarata, J. Cryst. Maturation 296, 159 (2006).
(21.) S. Kodambaka, J. Tersoff, M. C. Reuter, F. M. Ross, Phys. Rev. Left. 96, 096105 (2006).
(22.) O. G. Shpyrko et al., Science 313, 77 (2006).
(23.) Q. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. Left. 97, 155701 (2006).
(24.) F. M. Ross, J. Tersoff, M. C. Reuter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146104 (2005).
(25.) F. Glas,. Harmand, Phys. Rev. B 73, 155320 (2006).
(26.), and speculative which all hot air is performed away,... In the eventuality of hot air deficits through radiation about the ambient, .-2] K.
(27.) N. Mingo, L. Yang, D. Li, A. Majumdar, Nano Left. 3, 1713 (2003).
(28.) S. D. Peteves, R. Abbaschian, Metall. Trans. A 22A, 1259 (1991).
(29.) T. B. Massalski, J. L. Murray, L. H. Bennett, H. Baker, Eds. Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (American Society for Alloys, Alloys Park, OH, 1986), vol. 1, pp. 263-264.
(30.) J. L. Taraci et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 5302 (2004).
(31.) M. J. Aziz, within the Chosen Works of John W. Cahn, W. C. Carter, W. C. Johnson, Eds. (Vitamins, Alloys, and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1998), pp. 207-209.
(32.) D. R. Lide, Ed., CRC Manual of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Squeeze, Boca Raton, FL, 2005).
(33.) We acknowledge R. M. Tromp, S. Guha, M. A. Aziz, and E. Tutuc for handy debates; A. Ellis for the improvement of in situ microscopy facilities; and L. Gignac and K. B. Reuter for energy-dispersive x-ray and electron energy-loss spectroscopy examines of the cables. This work was partially fueled by Immunity Advanced Scientific studies Agency (DARPA) under contract N66001-05-C-6030.
. S1
20 Dec 2006;
S. Kodambaka, * J. Tersoff, M. C. Reuter, F. M. Ross ([knife])
IBM T. J. Watson Research Centre, Yorktown Altitudes, New york i0598, United.
* Present address: Materials Science Division, College of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United. ([knife]) To whom letter probably will be addressed.
